Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Finally found a good way to represent time

Hi Everyone,

Well, I had lots of input from people here and from my HCI friends. I think I've finally hit on a something that will accurately show time and the scale I'm wanting to convey. Now, instead of it just showing you a number of years (which no one seemed to like) it moves you back in time. Famous dates fly past and a counter keeps track of the years, kind of like a time machine. What I like about this is that if physically shows the distance between you and the celebrity, and as they shrink on the horizon, one realizes just how far away their wealth places them from you.

I don't have a lot of inherent artistic ability, so these screenshots use icons that I found as a way of mocking things up. :)



I also worked on some sound design, and came up with this for the sound that happens once you press "Start Working".

Short Trip mp3
Long Trip mp3

Monday, September 29, 2008

The Right Representation

I admit that when I picked this topic, I already had at least a vague concept of how I want it to work. I am very much inspired by the work of Ben Fry (you can see some of it at his website at http://www.benfry.com/ in case you’re not familiar)—he is, in fact, the reason I decided to get a CS minor. I like the way in which he does information design by combining graphic design with programming skills, so that information that is constantly updated or changing can still be accommodated and made easier to process.

I wanted to do something similar, which is why I picked a topic with a lot of statistical data that, at least in theory, could be programmed to be updated as new data comes in. For this reason as well, my mental concept of how the finished product of this project should look is something along the lines of a dynamic chart or bar graph.

Because there is so much information, with levels of hierarchy where some information is more important, I want to give the user the option to add layers (or levels). I think the starting layer should be limited to just human population growth over time. Then, like adding layers of transparency paper, the user can add other layers and levels of information—more about population growth (for example, the birth rate), or information from the other 2 categories (environmental degradation and adoption rates). Some provisions will have to be made to accommodate the fact that some of this data will have different scales (for example, number of births vs. degrees of average global temperature increase), but the unifying factor would be time—for most of the data, I have been able to find at least approximations dating back to around 1900. So, it is quite possible to compare the data even across different scales.

I guess my biggest issue is not so much figuring out what to do next—I have at least a few ideas for that—but wondering whether I should’ve been exploring more options as to other, less graph-like representations of my data. That’s the one problem with coming into a project like this with more than just a vague idea of what you want to do and how you want to do it—it becomes harder to see and explore other options. That’s part of the reason why I haven’t posted as much recently; I’d been trying to take a step or two back from the project and see if taking a “mental break” would allow me to see some other possibilities for representing my data. But I guess I’ve come to accept the fact that this is the only solid representation I can foresee working for me and the nature of the information I am trying to display, and that at this point I just need to work on moving forward.

I have a few rough sketches of ideas, but my scanner is not cooperating. I’m going to try to start working more on the computer within the next few days, and I’ll post some of that work as I make more progress. For now, any suggestions or feedback so far would be very helpful.

Progress

Here are some images of my progress and ideas. The first image is giving an idea of population density in Pittsburgh neighborhoods. It is focused on "persons per square mile." The lighter the color, the less "persons per square mile." I may need a key for this, but I'm giving it a try without.



The second image shows if the population in Pittsburgh neighborhoods is increasing or decreasing. So far it is mostly decreasing. I'm wondering if I need the person on all of them or just here and there in the larger ones. That way it is less cluttered. So some would have person and arrow while smaller areas would only have an arrow.



The third image is combining the previous two.


There will also be an image showing schools, hospitals, etc and one for either crime or housing. The last image shown will be a combination of everything.

I am working in print so I thought maybe I could have a book and when it opens the back shows the Pittsburgh map and then there are overlays on each side that can be overlapped and interacted with. Because of the way it is set up (an overlay on all sides of the square) people can mix and match what information they want. There will also be an area with all of the neighborhood names somewhere. The sketch below shows my possible layout.

coming soon....

Hey guys. I just wanted to check in and let you know that I have not forgotten this class. I've been crazy busy, but I will have sketches up later today that show where I am headed. These will consist of different layers of information as well as how my print piece will interact.